<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pitch Invasion - A Blog Exploring Soccer Around The World &#187; Mo Johnston</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/tag/mo-johnston/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pitchinvasion.net</link>
	<description>A soccer blog featuring essays, news and photography exploring soccer around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Sweeper: Mo Johnston is lucky he&#8217;s not in Seattle</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/11/03/the-sweeper-mo-johnston-is-lucky-hes-not-in-seattle/</link>
		<comments>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/11/03/the-sweeper-mo-johnston-is-lucky-hes-not-in-seattle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Dunmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Carey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mo Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Sounders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto FC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=4276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The business models and levels of fan involvement at Toronto and Seattle are worlds apart.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong></p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_4279" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><strong><strong><img class="size-medium wp-image-4279" title="Drew Carey" src="http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/drew-carey-300x210.jpg" alt="Drew Carey" width="300" height="210" /></strong> </strong></dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p><strong>Big Story<br />
</strong>The dramatic failure of <strong>Toronto FC </strong>this year, after a struggling season was concluded as the club blew its chance of making the playoffs by getting torn apart 5-0 by Red Bull New York, has thrown the entire direction of the team up for debate as well as the future of general manager <strong>Mo Johnston</strong>.</p>
<p>Paul James in the Globe and Mail says <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/vision-guidelines-lacking-in-tfc-blueprint/article1349072/">TFC have been ignoring the basic requirements in the recruitment of the team</a>, concluding that &#8220;without a clear vision as to where you are going and then a plan as to how you are going to get there, you really have very little chance&#8221;. Meanwhile, TFC&#8217;s owners, <strong>MLSE</strong>, <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/sports/soccer/story/2009/11/02/sp-anselmi-tfc-johnston.html">are forced to defend Mo and the two-year contract extension they oddly granted him in the middle of a mediocre season</a> saying that &#8220;the direction is the right direction&#8221;. I barely dare ask if TFC fans agree: the club may be profitable, but failing to make the playoffs in its first three seasons is obviously unacceptable performance-wise.</p>
<p>Johnston is lucky that TFC do not have the same system as Seattle, where the supporters&#8217; membership get to vote on their general manager every four years and can call a special election in between. <strong>Drew Carey</strong>, the <strong>Seattle Sounders</strong> celebrity part-owner, is <a href="http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/63949">interviewed by the Sports Business Journal</a>, and says it was this system itself that prompted him to get involved in MLS, as he discusses the highs and lows of ownership.</p>
<p>Self-aggrandizing perhaps, Carey says he loves being involved with Seattle because &#8220;you can see which teams are run by people who love the   game and which teams are run by accountants. There are a lot of teams out there   strictly run by accountants,&#8221; pointing at the riches being made by the ever-struggling Detroit Lions in the NFL.  Carey continues, &#8220;Joe Roth, me, Adrian Hanauer,   Vulcan Group, we’ve all got plenty of dough. We’re only in it to win and to put   out a good product. Nobody buys an MLS franchise thinking, “Oh, I’m going to   make so much money.”&#8221;</p>
<p>Toronto fans may beg to differ as they consider the business plan MLSE has demonstrated so far. Perhaps it&#8217;s time MLSE demonstrated some commitment to the fanbase that&#8217;s making them a lot of money and gave them a say in who runs the club.</p>
<p><strong>Worldwide News</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Sid Lowe in the Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2009/nov/03/atletico-madrid-worst-run-club-europe">asks if <strong>Athletico Madrid</strong> are Europe&#8217;s worst-run club</a>, ahead of their clash with Chelsea today &#8212; that would be quite an achievement, but he makes a pretty good case.</li>
<li>The financial mess at <strong>Hull City</strong> is <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1224812/EXCLUSIVE-Cash-crisis-Premier-league-strugglers-Hull-blew-5-5m-agents.html#ixzz0VmPz0qYx">broken down by Matt Lawton</a>, who reveals the alarming fact the club spent £5.5million in agents’ fees in the two years <strong>Paul Duffen</strong> was the club’s chairman and chief executive&#8221;, with a £40 million wage-bill threatening the future of the club. New Hull City chairman <strong>Adam Pearson</strong> tried assuage fears by saying the club was in &#8220;no danger&#8221;, but it remains unclear how the £22m the club owes can possibly be repaid.</li>
<li>A Member of Parliament on Tyneside has called for <strong>Newcastle</strong> owner <strong>Mike Ashley</strong> to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/tyne/8339594.stm">reconsider selling the naming rights to St. James Park</a>.</li>
<li>UEFA boss <strong>Michel Platini</strong> again discusses his plans for reform and regulation of European football, believing it would ultimately benefit<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/6488300/Michel-Platini-who-would-be-stupid-enough-to-buy-Manchester-United-or-Chelsea.html"> English football&#8217;s financial model</a>. His more than reasonable explanations of his reasoning deserve more consideration than screaming tabloid headlines about the Frenchman&#8217;s plans to destroy English football.</li>
<li>In <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/sow/news?slug=goal-japandebatewhatiswrongwitht&amp;prov=goal&amp;type=lgns">what could have been an interesting article but ends up being a bit of direction-less ramble</a> (as is common on goal.com), a strangely uncredited author looks at <strong>Kawasaki Frontale&#8217;s</strong> disappointing failure to live up to their promise once again after the defeat to FC Tokyo in the Nabisco Cup final. We need more articles like these in English on Asian football, but we do need them to be edited a little better.</li>
<li><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EPLTalk/~3/1HRLUaF20Tw/12567">EPL Talk looks at the surging ratings for EPL games on <strong>Fox Soccer Channel</strong></a>, which have grown a remarkable 69% in the past year with highs of almost 300,000 viewers becoming a regular occurrence despite its continued niche status on cable networks, reaching only 34.7 million homes. With the channel  going HD in January and the Premier League rights sewn up for a few years ahead, the future looks very bright for FSC. <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/367028-Fox_Soccer_Nets_Viewer_Gains.php">MLS ratings grew even faster</a>, <span>up 89% and averaging 51,000 per broadcast.<br />
</span></li>
<li>One of the better blogs out there, <strong>Some People Are On The Pitch</strong>, <a href="http://www.spaotp.com/2009/11/spaotps-1000th-post.html">celebrated its 1,000th post today</a>. Keeping a blog going with good quality posting for three years is a tremendous achievement. Check it out as they move towards the next thousand.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The Sweeper appears daily. For more rambling and links throughout the day every day, follow your editor Tom Dunmore <a href="http://www.twitter.com/pitchinvasion">@pitchinvasion on Twitter</a>.</strong></p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;"><em>The AST has a good relationship with both Stan Kroenke and members of his team at Kroenke Sports Enterprises (KSE). We have stressed to them the importance of custodianship and that the club will be stronger if it has supporters directly involved in its ownership model. While we cannot vouch for their future actions we are encouraged that they have said they see the AST having an important role to play at Arsenal. </em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/11/03/the-sweeper-mo-johnston-is-lucky-hes-not-in-seattle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mo Johnston Signing: Sectarianism and the Business of the Old Firm</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/07/16/the-mo-johnston-signing-sectarianism-and-the-business-of-the-old-firm/</link>
		<comments>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/07/16/the-mo-johnston-signing-sectarianism-and-the-business-of-the-old-firm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Dunmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World Soccer Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celtic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graeme Souness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mo Johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=1703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty years ago, the signing of Mo Johnston by Rangers made him the most controversial player in British football history -- the past of the Old Firm's sectarianism explains why the move was made, and a religious taboo was broken.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His house was petrol-bombed, his father was attacked, and he was called the &#8220;Salmon Rushdie of football&#8221;. It was twenty years ago this week that former Celtic star Mo Johnston became the  first well-known Roman Catholic to sign for Rangers, and Glasgow erupted. One enraged Rangers fan said that, &#8220;My blood is boiling. Is Mo Johnston going to run about Ibrox with his crucifix?&#8221;</p>
<p>The religious and political overtones were evident when the <a href="http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/scottish/the-day-mo-johnston-signed-for-rangers-14397035.html"><em>Belfast Telegraph</em> broke the news in Ulster</a>: a group of &#8220;angry loyalists&#8221; marched to their office and demanded they retract the unbelievable &#8220;fairytale&#8221; of Rangers signing a high-profile Catholic. Twenty years later, the <em>Telegraph</em> notes that Rangers signing a Catholic would not even &#8220;raise an eyebrow&#8221;. How much has changed, and why did Rangers make the decision to break with their unpleasant &#8220;tradition&#8221;?</p>
<p>The history of the sectarian divide at the centre of the furor was embedded in the divisions of Scottish society, but it was also a history that in the case of the Old Firm, had almost as much to do with business as with religion. For a long time, religious bigotry made both clubs rich; by the late 1980s, the opposite was the case, and the Johnston signing broke a taboo that would never again have the same meaning for Rangers or Celtic.</p>
<p><strong>The History of Sectarianism and the Old Firm in Glasgow</strong></p>
<p>The intensity of sectarianism in Scotland dates back to the severe extent of the Protestant Reformation in Scotland, where according to Bill Murray&#8217;s 1984 book &#8220;The Old Firm: Sectarianism, Sport and Society in Scotland&#8221;, &#8220;every sign, sound and sight of popery was removed from the reformed creed&#8221;. In 1790, the total Catholic population in Glasgow numbered 39; yet there were no fewer than 43 active anti-Catholic societies in the city. As Catholic immigration to Scotland from Ireland increased with industrialisation, tensions only intensified in the nineteenth century ahead of the founding of Rangers and Celtic in its final decades.</p>
<p>Religious tension soon suffused the derby matches between Rangers and Celtic, though it was notable that the mutually beneficial commercial appeal of their matches led to the nickname &#8220;The Old Firm&#8221; &#8212; the <em>Scottish Referee</em> ran a cartoon for the 1904 Scottish Cup Final with a sandwich board reading &#8220;Patronise The Old Firm&#8221;.  Football had exploded in Scotland, Glasgow in particular, with three of the biggest stadiums in the world opening at the turn of the twentieth century, Ibrox, Parkhead and Hampden &#8212; and by becoming the cultural symbols of sectarian divide in Scottish society, Rangers and Celtic soon eclipsed all other clubs in popularity as supporters rushed to them as religious markers.</p>
<div id="attachment_1713" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1713" title="old-firm" src="http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/old-firm.jpg" alt="The Old Firm in recent times" width="500" height="311" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The Old Firm in recent times</p></div>
<p>Neither Rangers or Celtic were technically sectarian clubs, unlike others including Edinburgh&#8217;s Hibernians, whose constitution initially stated that all players had to be practising Catholics. But it soon became clear that the identity of each club as the representative of their respective religious faction fed strongly into the appeal of each, and made their rivalry only more lucrative. As Murray writes of Rangers, early presidents such as Sir John Ure Primrose Bart &#8220;were clearly aware of the financial benefits they could gain from their challenge to Celtic, and the clearer the religious lines in these games, the better for rivalry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Celtic were founded by Brother Walfrid in 1888, from the Irish Catholic Marist Brothers with stated charitable purposes, but also to give young Catholic men a social outlet that would keep them away from Protestant influence &#8212; and it became a limited liability company by the century&#8217;s end.  Celtic&#8217;s success was immediate. They became indelibly linked with Catholicism and Irish sympathies (many in the club were closely connected to Irish republican causes). Despite this, they employed non-Catholics as players and administrators from their early days. Sectarianism at Celtic, for what its worth, was more sympathetic than discriminatory, though it certainly brought politics into sport and remained at the heart of their identity.</p>
<p>Sectarianism was even more obvious at Rangers. In its first hundred years, no Rangers management was Catholic, and staff found out to have been Catholic were often dismissed, according to Murray. Rangers players even found to be dating Catholics found themselves in trouble. For decades after Word War II, the club did not knowingly sign a Catholic player (Laurie Blyth was signed for the 1950-51 season, and the discovery of his Catholicism led to his release at the end of the season). Even before World War II, only one Catholic, Archie Kyle, stayed with the club for more than a couple of years, out of the mere dozen or so Catholics who even played at all for Rangers.  By the mid-1970s their manager, Jock Wallace, was encouraging players to roar the Unionist catchphrase &#8216;No Surrender&#8217; on their way up the tunnel before matches.</p>
<div id="attachment_1712" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1712" title="rangers-rsc" src="http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/rangers-rsc.jpg" alt="Rangers Supporters in Dublin" width="500" height="318" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Rangers Supporters in Dublin</p></div>
<p>Old Firm matches had become tinderboxes of bigotry and violence. Certainly, this was not a result of the football itself, or the creation of the clubs: it fed off sectarian rioting that went far beyond the terraces. But the naked sectarianism was so embedded at the clubs, it almost passed without mention in the decades after World War II that Rangers would never sign an open Catholic, or that politics pervaded the Parkhead terraces.</p>
<p>Sectarianism was part of the culture of the clubs, who did little to challenge what had become the lucrative bedrock of the Old Firm rivalry, though Celtic were notably more open to addressing it honestly than Rangers. Jock Stein, after all, became a Celtic legend &#8212; and he had been their first Protestant manager, appointed in 1965; there was no comparable opening up by Rangers, who had a hard time denying their bigotry. Rangers director George Brown explained in a <em>Daily Express</em> article in 1972 &#8220;Why we will not sign a Catholic&#8221;, based on the club&#8217;s tradition.</p>
<p>By the 1970s and 1980s, Rangers&#8217; sectarian policies were no longer tacitly accepted by the public or authorities; outside the hardcore Orange Order sympathisers, their closed attitude attracted more and more criticism that the club ignored. European competition, in particular, demonstrated the difference between the clubs: where Celtic fans were considered a credit to the club on travels abroad, Rangers fans brought disrepute that soon became attached to the club&#8217;s hardline sectarian attitude. Riots in Barcelona and Birmingham in the mid-1970s brought shame on the club, with Managing Director Willie Waddell tacitly admitted the cause by announcing in public the club would sign a Catholic if one was &#8220;good enough&#8221; &#8212; thus dissociating the club from a policy it officially denied even existed!</p>
<p>But no high profile signing came, and the club continued to bury its head in the sand, with fears that signing a Catholic would drive thousands from the terraces. The sectarianism even drove away Alex Ferguson from signing on as Rangers manager in 1983: a former Rangers player, Ferguson would not countenance managing the club until it unequivocally abandoned its unofficial sectarian ban on signing Catholics.</p>
<p><strong>The Mo Johnston Case</strong></p>
<p>For the rest of the 1980s, little changed until the day Mo Johnston was stunningly snatched away from Cetic by Rangers manager Graeme Souness and Chairman David Murray on his return from Nantes in France in 1989, shocking Ranger supporters, many of whom burned scarves and season tickets outside Ibrox in protest. And of course, he became Judas to Celtic fans. Johnston was not the first Catholic to play for Rangers, but he was certainly the most controversial.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<div id="attachment_1711" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 521px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1711 " title="Mo Johnston and Graeme Souness" src="http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/johnston-souness.jpg" alt="Mo Johnston and Graeme Souness" width="511" height="351" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Mo Johnston and Graeme Souness</p></div>
<p>Many Rangers fans make the point that it wasn&#8217;t so much Johnston&#8217;s Catholicism itself that was the cause of the furor; it was that it was Johnston <em>in particular</em>, a former star for Celtic who had head-butted Rangers&#8217; Stuart Munro in the 1986 Skol Cup final and taunted Rangers fans on his way off the pitch after receiving a red card. But if it was something personal, Rangers fans were soon to forgive as Johnston started scoring goals for Rangers, including a winner against Celtic. Despite the minority of Rangers fans who foreswore returning to Ibrox, the great fear that a Catholic signing would drive away the crowds proved to be far from true for the great majority of Rangers supporters. Instead, the signing would be the crucial catalyst to ensure Rangers had a place at the table of the European elite in the 1990s.</p>
<p>For a few, certainly, signing Johnston was beyond the pale.  One Rangers fan, Rob Kenny, lamented on the day of the signing that &#8220;This is a kick in the teeth. . .We&#8217;ve managed for over 100 years without Catholics, why should we need them now?&#8221;</p>
<p>In fact, as was often the case with the Old Firm, the answer was money. Where before there had been good business in keeping with what had become a &#8216;tradition&#8217; of barely disguised bigotry to guarantee the teams the greatest support in the Protestant and Catholic communities across Scotland and even in Ireland, it became evident in the 1990s that the commercial, gobalising imperatives of football required a less obviously bigoted identity, especially for Rangers.</p>
<p>Major global sponsors would not invest in clubs associated with sectarianism and the global transfer market made it foolish to exclude players based on religion. David Murray, the Rangers chairman who had taken over the year before Johnston&#8217;s signing, explained it all succinctly: &#8220;Sectarianism has no place in a European Super League.&#8221; Bigotry was now bad for business, and both teams have run public campaigns to stamp out sectarianism at games since then, with considerably more effect than earlier, less than half-hearted efforts in the 1970s and 1980s.</p>
<p>Sectarianism has far from vanished from the culture of support around the Old Firm despite the campaigns by both clubs, but much has been done to sanitise the Old Firm&#8217;s bitter rivalry since the signing of Johnston twenty years ago broke the back of Rangers discriminatory &#8220;tradition&#8221; &#8212; and the lucrative business of the Old Firm rolls on, with the European Super League still in their sights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/07/16/the-mo-johnston-signing-sectarianism-and-the-business-of-the-old-firm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

