William Hill Bingo
Pitch Invasion - A Global Soccer Blog
Pitch Invasion Twitter Pitch Invasion Facebook Pitch Invasion Google+

Can Brazil Produce Another Marta?

Posted July 22, 2010 in Women's soccer by

Like Jennifer Doyle, I have only questions about the FIFA U-20 Women’s World Cup from watching it so far.

And my main question so far is this: what has happened to Brazil women’s soccer?  Brazil crashed out in the first round at this World Cup. Well, to be fair, they didn’t exactly crash out: they came third in a group containing two countries very strong in women’s soccer, Sweden and North Korea (champions of the 2006 U-20 Women’s World Cup, and finalists in 2008).  But their only win came against New Zealand, who lost all three of their games.

This from the country that has produced in recent years Marta, Cristiane and Formiga, to name three of the best women’s players in the world over the past half-decade.

But it appears the development of women’s soccer in Brazil has completely stalled, from the available evidence. At the first U-17 Women’s World Cup held in 2008, Brazil finished bottom of their group, failing to win a game. Brazil did better at the 2008 U-20 Women’s World Cup, topping their group, then losing to a strong German side in the next round. Brazil finished third in 2006. The trend, though, is clearly one that’s gone dramatically downwards for Brazil in youth competition in the past few years.

The senior team, inspired by the remarkable crop of Marta, Cristiane, Formiga, Fabiana et al, had up to 2008 a remarkable record in recent years: silver at both the 2004 and 2008 Olympic Games, and second place at the 2007 World Cup. Seven of their 2008 Olympic team currently play in WPS, arguably the world’s leading professional women’s league.

Marta, Brazil

However, it appears that production line is stalling, judging from international youth results. Indeed, the problem perhaps is it’s not really a production line at all: women’s soccer in Brazil lacks any kind of structure, with no national league (hence why so many of their national team plays abroad), and a haphazard method of discovering young talent. And that talent has to overcome a considerable stigma against women participating in soccer, as the well-known story of Marta reminds us, from this interview with her from the New York Times last year:

“I had to do all of it by myself,” she said through a Portuguese interpreter. (She speaks Swedish fluently and, according to her new teammates, is rapidly picking up English.) “There wasn’t anybody for me to follow, or anyone to say to me, These are the steps you must take. First of all, I was almost always the only girl playing with boys in a small town. Some boys accepted me, some didn’t. And my family had comments made to them. Brazil is still a very macho society, and sports are mainly for boys, so people would say to them: What is this girl doing? Why is she always out there in the soccer games with the boys?”

And even Marta, four-time FIFA World Player of the Year, cannot seem to lead change in Brazil, with the authorities remaining resolutely opposed to supporting women’s soccer. As John Turnbull at the Global Game tells us:

Marta and her teammates have been advocating for a Brazilian league, but they are battling institutional inertia and a history that banned soccer for women until 1979. The federal government beginning in the 1980s limited sponsorship opportunities for women and prevented their competitions from being held at athletic grounds, consigning them to, in many cases, the beaches in Rio.

Copacabana Beach, in fact, in 1981 served as the venue for the first women’s tournament. The strongest women’s side through much of the 1980s, Esporte Clube Radar, used the beach as its home ground. Opposition to women playing football has been constant. The challenges range from the physical—Marta reports that her brother hit her when he found she was playing, and BBC columnist Tim Vickery‘s girlfriend says she got similar lashings from her father (BBC Sport, Sept 10)—to the subtly patronizing gender stereotypes that frame women, in the main, as an object of the male gaze or as devoted disciples of home and church.

“Today, when I came into the field, I heard a guy say that I should be at a laundry sink, washing clothes,” said a Radar player in 1984. “But I did not bother to reply to him, although I was angry. My reaction came later, with the ball at my feet.”

Female soccer was banned entirely by law between 1964 and 1975 in Brazil.  Since then, the successful team led by Marta that developed from that point on, culminating in second place at the 2007 Women’s World Cup, ought to have presaged change, one would think: except that the Brazilian national women’s team, as far as I can tell, hasn’t actually played a game for around two years.

To see how poorly the national team is organised and treated in Brazil despite being one of the top three or four in the world, we can look back to a dispute following that 2007 World Cup, where the players felt they weren’t renumerated fairly for their performance that earned the Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF) almost $1 million in prize money. This resulted in the national team sending a collective letter to the CBF asking for support:

In the World Cup, for example, the Brazilian federation received $850,000 (US) from FIFA for the team’s second-place finish. The players say they are still unaware how much each of them will receive from that amount. The players are also demanding bonus money for their gold-medal finish at the Pan Am Games, which they say they still have not been paid. According to O Globo, it took two years for the 2004 Olympic team players to receive their bonus money for the silver medal at Athens.

The Brazil women are asking for a raise in their daily expense stipend from the current $35 (US) when playing abroad; a restoration of the team cook, a position that was left vacant at the start of the year as a cost-cutting measure (supposedly the absence of typical Brazilian foods like beans while the team were in China lengthened Formiga’s recovery time from leg cramps); and a greater number of matches for the national team, which currently has nothing scheduled until April.

At the conclusion of the letter, the players said that they have fulfilled their duty and have always given the maximum for the national team, Globo reports. The letter ends with the following phrase, in capital letters: “We need support”.

This raises a local and a broader point: more widely, once again there is evidence for why FIFA needs to pay players directly at the World Cup, to ensure they are paid on a fair and timely bass.

The local point is that the CBF, under Ricardo Teixeira’s corrupt leadership, is doing a remarkable disservice to one of the greatest women’s national teams of all time, missing a massive opportunity to use the starpower, skill and style of the likes of Marta to develop women’s soccer domestically in Brazil.

Brazil’s president Lula, following the World Cup pay dispute in 2007, made the same point:

“I think we have to prepare other matches. In other words, these girls can’t play only every four years or play now and then,” he said.

“I think these girls, who are not as valued as they should be by the entities that deal with women’s sports in Brazil, need to raise their heads and know that we are at the beginning a very long process and that they are valued, and have made Brazil proud.”

It appears, three years on, little has changed. Brazil’s top players are abroad; there is no domestic league (a national cup competition, Copa do Brasil de Futebol Feminino, has at least been created, upon FIFA’s request); and the Brazilian women’s national team is essentially disbanded aside from major tournaments. It may well reassemble and perform well at next year’s Women’s World Cup in Germany, given the talent it still has now, but how it will fair in the future given the lack of investment in the sport that is showing at youth international level is seriously open to question. This is a tremendous waste of an opportunity by the CBF (who are, unlike national associations in many countries, more than rich enough to be unable to claim poverty as an excuse for not developing the sport).

There is no doubt women’s soccer in Brazil has made extraordinary progress since the 1970s, when even playing the game was illegal for Brazilian women. Yet at the same time, Brazil risks falling behind the rest of the world as the next Marta still faces an uphill battle to play the game.



By

Tom Dunmore is the founder of Pitch Invasion. Originally from Brighton, England, he's now resident in Chicago. He is also the editor of Stadium Porn and the author of the Historical Dictionary of Soccer. Follow Tom @pitchinvasion on Twitter.
Email | Twitter | Facebook

25 Comments

  1. Hi Tom, I’m brazilian and watch the WPS online. I’m very angry with cbf, because not have any investment in women’s soccer…. the usa wnt has two friendly with sweden last week, and wnt brazil didn’t play this year…. the number of girls that play in Brazil today is very expressive, despite the whole prejudice that still exists (but already it reduced too much). The only team who invests same in the feminine soccer is Santos (Santos got a sponsorship of a million real for feminine soccer…And is the same sponsor that last year, they had invested 500 thousand and was satisfied and renewed for a million this year). Santos do an excellent work with feminine soccer in Brazil. Only that cbf solved hire Santos’ coach to be coach of Brazil…. Now, wnt Brazil don’t have coach’s exclusiveness, since he continues training Santos…. And if you accompanied the feminine soccer last year, Brazil equalized in the friendly that did against the Germany, lost for Sweden 3-1 and almost did not manage to win Mexico!!! Even playing with Marta and Cristiane!!!! So. Do not wait a lot of Brazil in the World Championship of 2011…Probably will not pass of the first phase… The exit of Jorge Barcellos was an involução of the feminine soccer and everyone already saw that, less cbf.

  2. Brazil is too strong of a soccer-producing country (on the women’s side too) to not produce another great player soon, but the discontent expressed by Izabel is something I have heard from a couple of other fans down there. Clearly, there is not enough investment on the women’s side of the CBF, which shocks me consider the team has been so successful and most pressingly, Brazil is hosting the 2014 World Cup. FIFA has initiatives in place to make sure for equality on the pitch and equal opportunities, which is why we saw Qatar start a women’s soccer league. Qatar is bidding for the 2022 World Cup and knows there needs to be female representation. I am surprised Brazil is not under more pressure from FIFA.

  3. Never write a great team off, Brazil will be back producing top players soon

  4. Laisa Andrioli will save them.

  5. I think the Brazil women’s team will be able to find some more great players. However, i don’t think it’s going to be easy. There is a problem with the federal government not wanting women to play soccer. This is a huge problem for women’s soccer in Brazil. Marta has to focus on changing the perception of the sport so that the federal government accepts women’s soccer as a great sport for the country and people.

  6. i tottally agree: Laisa Andrioli will be the next Marta, her skills are unbelivable!

  7. Brazil is a soccer people factory. New player will came and go every year.
    I believe when the time come, a better player then Marta will be out there.

  8. To the commenter above: “The federal government doesn’t want women to play soccer”!? Where did you come up with that nonsense?

  9. Yes of course she a great player and will be a role model and inspiration for the gals all over

  10. Brazilians are great soccer-players. They will be back on top soon.

  11. she is great footbaler. I don’t think there is no another or like martha. SO she is the one.

  12. You have a great team….:)

  13. I think she is the best player I have ever seen.

  14. “There is no doubt women’s soccer in Brazil has made extraordinary progress since the 1970s, when even playing the game was illegal for Brazilian women” No doubt this is great progress, but just like the WNBA, it’s never going to be as big as mens sports.

  15. Brazil needed Teamwork…

  16. Eu acredito que futuramente teremos uma nova mia hamm. pois assistir no youtube uma garota de 10 anos, que é fantástica, fenomenal, o nome dela é Catarina Macário.

  17. Well, er… at least for the 2011 world cup simply doing justice and simultaneously luring young girls and players in Brazil, the case is quite simple; it´s enough that Marta takes some advice with the correct people. then publicly declares she won´t participate in the WC unless Fifa pays DIRECTLY TO THE WOMEN PLAYERS the pro prize for participation every contending country is entitled to.

  18. To Ms. Antonucci:

    Thank you, Tonya, for your drive, wild day-by-day efforts, genuine love for the womens game all over this period ahead of Wps. The game fans in and outside the US express our heartful thanks to you. One day a strongly rooted and growing league will say the same. Pls stand by everything that reminds it and, pls, don´t fade away.

  19. This is the perfect blog for anyone who wants to know about this topic. You know so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really would want…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!
    :)

  20. This is a tremendous waste of an opportunity by the CBF (who are, unlike national associations in many countries, more than rich enough to be unable to claim poverty as an excuse for not developing the sport).

  21. For my opinion brazil is a great team and they will produce another marta. They must do it.

  22. For my opinion brazil is a great team and they will produce new marta. They must do it.

Trackbacks

  1. Emotional Raul Leaves Real Madrid, Man Utd & Man City Lose To MLS Sides, Larissa Riquleme Has A Freaky Birthmark » Who Ate all the Pies
  2. Marta: Brazil’s Billie Jean King? « tracingthetree