<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still Searching For 2010 World Cup Goals: A Historical Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2010/06/16/still-searching-for-2010-world-cup-goals-a-historical-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2010/06/16/still-searching-for-2010-world-cup-goals-a-historical-comparison/</link>
	<description>A soccer blog featuring essays, news and photography exploring soccer around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:59:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: In search of &#8216;quality&#8217; at the 2010 World Cup &#124; USA Trends</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2010/06/16/still-searching-for-2010-world-cup-goals-a-historical-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-24777</link>
		<dc:creator>In search of &#8216;quality&#8217; at the 2010 World Cup &#124; USA Trends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=10970#comment-24777</guid>
		<description>[...] have noted the first round produced one of the lowest ever averages; prior to today it was 1.56, compared to 2.2 for the universally panned 1990 World Cup. Even so, football is normally a sport that can entertain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have noted the first round produced one of the lowest ever averages; prior to today it was 1.56, compared to 2.2 for the universally panned 1990 World Cup. Even so, football is normally a sport that can entertain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2010/06/16/still-searching-for-2010-world-cup-goals-a-historical-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-24724</link>
		<dc:creator>KT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=10970#comment-24724</guid>
		<description>No, I meant &quot;37? In a row?&quot;

Surely somebody out there gets that reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I meant &#8220;37? In a row?&#8221;</p>
<p>Surely somebody out there gets that reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Withering World Cup &#38; Brazilian Brightness</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2010/06/16/still-searching-for-2010-world-cup-goals-a-historical-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-24719</link>
		<dc:creator>Withering World Cup &#38; Brazilian Brightness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 01:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=10970#comment-24719</guid>
		<description>[...] Theories abounded that this World Cup would favor attacking teams. The cold weather was supposed to lead to superior fitness and, ergo, a goalfest of epic proportions. However, these scientific theories overlooked a very simple fact &#8211; we live in the dark ages of soccer. Despite Barcelona&#8217;s great season a year ago and Spain&#8217;s title as European champion, the tendency to pack the box and not risk tossing numbers forward plagues the world of football like pox-carrying rats. These locusts have resulted in a paltry first round goal total and abysmal goal per game percentage. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Theories abounded that this World Cup would favor attacking teams. The cold weather was supposed to lead to superior fitness and, ergo, a goalfest of epic proportions. However, these scientific theories overlooked a very simple fact &#8211; we live in the dark ages of soccer. Despite Barcelona&#8217;s great season a year ago and Spain&#8217;s title as European champion, the tendency to pack the box and not risk tossing numbers forward plagues the world of football like pox-carrying rats. These locusts have resulted in a paltry first round goal total and abysmal goal per game percentage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Dunmore</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2010/06/16/still-searching-for-2010-world-cup-goals-a-historical-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-24687</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Dunmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=10970#comment-24687</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve lost me, KT.  It&#039;s a listing of the total number of goals in the first 16 games in each tournament.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve lost me, KT.  It&#8217;s a listing of the total number of goals in the first 16 games in each tournament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2010/06/16/still-searching-for-2010-world-cup-goals-a-historical-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-24679</link>
		<dc:creator>KT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=10970#comment-24679</guid>
		<description>&quot;In 2006, there were 39 in the same first set of 16 games; in 2002, there were 46 in the first 16; in 1998, there were 37.&quot;

In a row?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In 2006, there were 39 in the same first set of 16 games; in 2002, there were 46 in the first 16; in 1998, there were 37.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a row?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

