<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sweeper: World Cup Seeding Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/10/16/the-sweeper-world-cup-seeding-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/10/16/the-sweeper-world-cup-seeding-controversy/</link>
	<description>A soccer blog featuring essays, news and photography exploring soccer around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: สถานที่ท่องเที่ยว</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/10/16/the-sweeper-world-cup-seeding-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-27763</link>
		<dc:creator>สถานที่ท่องเที่ยว</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=3755#comment-27763</guid>
		<description>-0- google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-0- google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sweeper: FIFA Is Trying To Kill Me &#124; Pitch Invasion</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/10/16/the-sweeper-world-cup-seeding-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-17106</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sweeper: FIFA Is Trying To Kill Me &#124; Pitch Invasion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=3755#comment-17106</guid>
		<description>[...] the speculation that FIFA are making the decision most convenient to them is fed, just as with the playoffs seeding controversy. If FIFA could only set and release their seeding procedures ahead of knowing which countries would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the speculation that FIFA are making the decision most convenient to them is fed, just as with the playoffs seeding controversy. If FIFA could only set and release their seeding procedures ahead of knowing which countries would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/10/16/the-sweeper-world-cup-seeding-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10005</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=3755#comment-10005</guid>
		<description>Its really nice post, keep it up.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com&quot;&gt;google&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its really nice post, keep it up.<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com">google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/10/16/the-sweeper-world-cup-seeding-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10002</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=3755#comment-10002</guid>
		<description>As long as France and Portugal fail to advance, giving the USA the slightest chance of getting a seed, I will be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as France and Portugal fail to advance, giving the USA the slightest chance of getting a seed, I will be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sms Falas</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/10/16/the-sweeper-world-cup-seeding-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-9975</link>
		<dc:creator>Sms Falas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=3755#comment-9975</guid>
		<description>ie, one FIFA feels needs review each time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ie, one FIFA feels needs review each time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Kumming</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/10/16/the-sweeper-world-cup-seeding-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-9972</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Kumming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=3755#comment-9972</guid>
		<description>The purpose of seeding teams is to increase the likelihood of &quot;tastier&quot; match ups later in the tournament. It seems cynical - and also not particularly insightful - to point it out, but it&#039;s the truth. If teams with larger international draw, say Portugal and France for example, were to paired in the playoffs, then one of them wouldn&#039;t be in the World Cup and that means lost television ratings. 

The key here is that not only would FIFA lose the attention in the home country (Portugal or France) but these are teams that draw attention internationally, they&#039;re &quot;big&quot; teams. Slovenia is not. (Interestingly, Bosnia might be arguable considering the large diaspora populations in the States and presumably elsewhere).

It&#039;s a fairly transparent tactic on the part of FIFA to assist the more popular national teams for their own ratings boost. NCAA basketball does it every year in the March Madness playoffs, but at least in that instance there has been an entire season of results on which to base seedings. Seems like FIFA&#039;s are a bit unfair in this instance since it&#039;s based on their screwball ratings system and not how each team has performed in the competition (WC qualifying) thus far. 

But FIFA isn&#039;t exactly known to be a friend to the underdog, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of seeding teams is to increase the likelihood of &#8220;tastier&#8221; match ups later in the tournament. It seems cynical &#8211; and also not particularly insightful &#8211; to point it out, but it&#8217;s the truth. If teams with larger international draw, say Portugal and France for example, were to paired in the playoffs, then one of them wouldn&#8217;t be in the World Cup and that means lost television ratings. </p>
<p>The key here is that not only would FIFA lose the attention in the home country (Portugal or France) but these are teams that draw attention internationally, they&#8217;re &#8220;big&#8221; teams. Slovenia is not. (Interestingly, Bosnia might be arguable considering the large diaspora populations in the States and presumably elsewhere).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a fairly transparent tactic on the part of FIFA to assist the more popular national teams for their own ratings boost. NCAA basketball does it every year in the March Madness playoffs, but at least in that instance there has been an entire season of results on which to base seedings. Seems like FIFA&#8217;s are a bit unfair in this instance since it&#8217;s based on their screwball ratings system and not how each team has performed in the competition (WC qualifying) thus far. </p>
<p>But FIFA isn&#8217;t exactly known to be a friend to the underdog, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Dunmore</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/10/16/the-sweeper-world-cup-seeding-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-9970</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Dunmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=3755#comment-9970</guid>
		<description>Rob -- because Europe is the only place with seeded playoffs, isn&#039;t it?  The established teams already have an advantage from the seeded qualifying draw in the group stage, as elsewhere. Seeding the playoffs after that stage as well, in which less established teams have already had to battle the odds because of the initial seedings, is a further disadvantage to the less established teams who have achieved as much as the seeded teams from the group stage. Other confederations also have their complicated seeding situations, but we&#039;re discussing the playoff system in Europe&#039;s fairness.

If it wasn&#039;t a debatable decision -- ie, one FIFA feels needs review each time -- it would be part of the established system, and not a decision the FIFA Executive Committee announces right before the end of the qualifying rounds.  Sure, they were following precedent, but why did they decide not to announce it until then?

The bigger question I&#039;m trying to raise is the whole value of seeding, and how far it should be used. How much do we want to favour established teams and for what purpose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8212; because Europe is the only place with seeded playoffs, isn&#8217;t it?  The established teams already have an advantage from the seeded qualifying draw in the group stage, as elsewhere. Seeding the playoffs after that stage as well, in which less established teams have already had to battle the odds because of the initial seedings, is a further disadvantage to the less established teams who have achieved as much as the seeded teams from the group stage. Other confederations also have their complicated seeding situations, but we&#8217;re discussing the playoff system in Europe&#8217;s fairness.</p>
<p>If it wasn&#8217;t a debatable decision &#8212; ie, one FIFA feels needs review each time &#8212; it would be part of the established system, and not a decision the FIFA Executive Committee announces right before the end of the qualifying rounds.  Sure, they were following precedent, but why did they decide not to announce it until then?</p>
<p>The bigger question I&#8217;m trying to raise is the whole value of seeding, and how far it should be used. How much do we want to favour established teams and for what purpose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://pitchinvasion.net/blog/2009/10/16/the-sweeper-world-cup-seeding-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-9969</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitchinvasion.net/?p=3755#comment-9969</guid>
		<description>The playoffs were also seeded in 1998 - the only reason the 2002 playoffs weren&#039;t were because of the situation in Israel, which caused their group to be completed late.

And every other qualifying draw for the 2010 World Cup was based on World Rankings - why would the European playoffs be different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The playoffs were also seeded in 1998 &#8211; the only reason the 2002 playoffs weren&#8217;t were because of the situation in Israel, which caused their group to be completed late.</p>
<p>And every other qualifying draw for the 2010 World Cup was based on World Rankings &#8211; why would the European playoffs be different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

