Comments on: The Gold Cup: Past, Present, Future

By: Costa Rica Weddings

Costa Rica Weddings — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:46:58 +0000

I agree with everyone twelve years is way too long!

By: slots and games

slots and games — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 08:54:12 +0000

This blog is very informative. Thanks for recounting some part of the history of the Gold Cup. Would it still maintain its shimmer in the future?

By: The Sweeper: Mr Chelsea Recommits, and Other News | Pitch Invasion

The Sweeper: Mr Chelsea Recommits, and Other News | Pitch Invasion — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:51:52 +0000

[...] 5-0 demolition of the United States in the Gold Cup final did nothing to convince me this shouldn’t be a tournament held every four years that would encourage every team to bring their A squad every time. It doesn’t feel like a [...]

By: Tom Dunmore

Tom Dunmore — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:35:49 +0000

Canada’s a good suggestion, they could handle it too, though not at the same level as the US, of course. Might be interesting to try it there sometime soon; though one suspects it’ll still be the US for the foreseeable future….Despite the result today!

By: Monica

Monica — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:21:15 +0000

Totally agree with A Ruiz. The cup has to be held every 4 years..twelve years is a too long time span and then only Mexico could host it. We’ve got lots of stadiums where the cup can be played.

By: A. Ruiz

A. Ruiz — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:48:19 +0000

The cup needs to be held every 4 years and someone other than the US needs to host it. Mexico is building a bunch of new stadiums, so they should be able to host it. Canada has enough CFL stadiums and BMO to have a go at it. But after that, it’s slim pickings.