Fabio Capello: Can a Manager Change the Identity of a Team?

Capello in the Sun.England are on the verge of appointing a new manager, which means that it’s a day to have opinions. If Italianness is not a quality you look for in a football coach, this is not the day to keep your thoughts a secret. If you had a dream about David Beckham last night, and he was holding a calzone, and he was in black and white, and he just looked at you in a way that said, “I’m so beautiful that I haven’t opened my mouth in fourteen years,” please get to a phone immediately.

It’s a day for opinions, and here’s mine: I think this Capello fellow is going to be an interesting choice for England. England, right now, are like a team that woke up in a hospital bed with a headache and a strange family sobbing beside them. They don’t seem to know who they are. They’re missing their identity. And Capello seems like a stubborn enough ego (unlike Steve McClaren, who was basically a slice of cheese ready to melt on the sandwich of anyone who approached him with a camera) to have an actual chance of giving them a new one.


Giving a team a personality is one of the least-well-defined skills in football management. You can talk about melding individual talents into a coherent whole, but most of the time talking about melding is just a distracting way to promise that you don’t know what you mean. It’s hard to talk about giving a team an identity because what’s an identity for a team? You know one when you see it—Italy has one; Switzerland doesn’t, quite—and you know it has to do with a team meaning something, so that when you think about the team, some distinct connotation arises in your mind, over and above personnel or kit colors or tactics. But how the connotation gets there is to some extent a mystery.

Personality computer

Teams don’t always need strong personalities in order to succeed—France won every trophy under the sun without one, no matter how hard people tried to extrapolate one from the essentially characterless Zidane—but the greatest teams all have them, and there’s something about the culture of football in England that suggests that, until the team gets one, the drinking subset of their fans is going to go on viewing the world through a hard red prism of utterly pointless rage.

Anyway, in a spirit of encouragement, I’ve put together a list of five managers whose appointments brought a strong new personality to their teams. It’s not that they’re the greatest managers of all time, or the most tactically innovative, though there are some of each on the list. But they all were able to impart a distinct identity to their sides, often one that sharply contrasted with what was there before. Whether Capello joins them or not will be fascinating to see.

Gusztáv Sebes — Hungary (1949). He took over a team that was best known for slowly trundling up the pitch and kicking a ball into the side of a haystack and transformed them into the most dynamic squad in Europe. Under Sebes, the famous Aranycsapat, the “Golden Team”—featuring the fearsome Ferenc Puskás, Sándor Kocsis, and the great Nándor Hidegkuti—developed an identity based on speed, movement, and fluidity, one which revolved around an attacking 4-2-4 formation and the innovative use of a withdrawn striker. What Sebes called their “socialist football” style anticipated Total Football by decades in requiring players to rotate among different positions. They achieved a still-unmatched 32-game unbeaten streak, scored six goals against England at Wembley, and remain the greatest team ever to be cheated out of the 1954 World Cup.

Bill ShanklyBill Shankly — Liverpool (1959). The obvious choice, but he couldn’t be left off the list. Shankly changed everything that could be changed about Liverpool while somehow preserving a sense of the club’s innate identity. Liverpool were still Liverpool, but somehow, under Shankly, that no longer meant they were terrible.

Helenio Herrera — Inter Milan (1960). Inter were hardly strangers to winning when Herrera took over—they were only nine years removed from their last title in Serie A, which was their seventh overall—but under his reign, they became the center of the catenaccio revolution that transformed, not only Inter, but all of Italian football. Suddenly, the word “Inter” meant a towering libero, a clinical counterattack, and a stifling 1-0 win. If you listen to people who lived through it, it would be 25 years before an Italian club scored a second goal in a match.

Rinus Michels — Ajax (1965). The seeds of Total Football were planted at Ajax by Jack Reynolds and developed invisibly for years, but it was Michels’s arrival as manager that reversed the decline of the Spurgeon/Gruber/Rowley years and brought the revolution into flower. Suddenly Ajax were not only moving in an interesting way on the pitch, they were moving in an interesting way and scoring three goals in the first fifteen minutes. Michels’s disciplinarian demeanor (he was nicknamed “The General”) never quite matched the liberated grace with which his teams played on the pitch, but one way or another he created the conditions that they needed to succeed. We can thank his Ajax team not only for the brilliance of Johan Cruyff and the perfection of the offside trap, but also for developments in football that are still taking place today—witness the number of Ajax-connected managers, administrators and players involved at high levels in top clubs throughout Europe.

Tony Adams and Arsene WengerArsène Wenger — Arsenal (1996). How much more completely can you change the personality of a club? All the way through the George Graham/Bruce Rioch years, “boring, boring Arsenal” played in a style that seemed to have a walrus mustache and be deathly afraid of crying. It was just the thing for an elephant hunt, but for beautiful football, not quite. Then Wenger arrived, and ever since they’ve been writing florid symphonies. The mechanical back lines and windy hoofs upfield have been replaced by intricate passing and movement so mathematically pure that I think they may have established a Unified Field Theory once in a 4-0 win against Millwall. Their old identity seems like a prehistoric relic. Arsenal, dull? I doubt an eleven-year-old fan could even be made to believe it.

This isn’t a complete list, obviously, just a few names that came to mind, and I’d love to hear more suggestions. Which managers have most dramatically changed the character of a team or the culture around it? What do you think: which managers should Capello be looking to emulate?

Brian Phillips is keeping the seat warm for the next man at The Run of Play.

Photo credits: Paul…//Thurston; Corx; petecarr; murray_fortescue

  • Share/Bookmark

Tagged as: ,

About the Author
Brian Phillips a regular contributor to Pitch Invasion, and writes The Run of Play.
Email this author | All posts by Brian Phillips

You might also like:

Capello, the Mafia, and England
There are 262,000 Google search results that combine the words "Capello" and "Mafia." "Capello" and "godfather"...
The Capello Effect: Watching Them Watching Us
Since it will take some time for the footballing effects of the appointment of Fabio Capello as England manager...
The Sweeper: ‘John Terry sleeps with some bird and everyone’s up in arms’
Big Story *sigh* So said Jimmy Greaves in an interview this weekend with the Independent.  While Pitch Invasion...
The Sweeper: Azza Books World Cup Spot
Big Story England manager John Terry announced Aaron Lennon had "played his way into the World Cup squad"...
Grab this Widget

10 Comments

  1. Excellent choices all, though I think you underestimate the quality of Hungarian and Mitteleuropaische football pre-Sebes a bit. After all, they had reached the World Cup Final in ‘38, and a certain Il Duce may or may not have influenced that particular result.

    Some other candidates: Herbert Chapman (Huddersfield Town and Arsenal), Hugo Meisl (the Austrian Wunderteam), Matt Busby (Manchester United), Don Revie (Leeds United, but not England or the UAE), Brian Clough (Derby County and Nottingham Forest, but not Leeds United or Brighton), Arrigo Sacchi (especially Parma and his first spell at Milan).

  2. BTW, Capello’s only model in this job will be himself. Some things never change.

  3. Ursus — Great list. I love that it’s necessary to specify the UAE as a team that Don Revie didn’t transform. Brian Clough and Hugo Meisl were both on my longlist, but the others didn’t occur to me.

    And you’re absolutely right, of course, about the status of pre-Sebes Hungarian football. Whenever I’m forced to choose between accurate historical representation and the image of a team kicking the ball into the side of a haystack, the facts are going to suffer. But, yes, Central Europe was loaded with football powers in the pre-war years and during Sebes’s time produced some of the most innovative managers in the world (Bela Guttmann, etc.) And Hungary must be the only team that can plausibly claim to have been cheated out of two World Cup wins. Someone should write a book about this.

  4. It is astonishing that no one has written a book about The Golden Team. Unless such a book does exist and I cannot find it.

    Brian may I take issue with your interpretation of the ‘54 World Cup Final? Much has been made of the tragedy of Hungary’s defeat and while the Germans were incredibly lucky, I would hesitate to suggest that the Hungarians cheated.

    If you haven’t read it already, can I suggest Tor! A history of German football written by Uli Hesse Lichtenberger? It gives an (understandably) sympathetic account of The Miracle Of Berne.

  5. Tor! is a marvellous book, the best of its genre.

    I assume that Brian is referring to the allegations of possible doping by the West Germans before the final and the theory that the foul in the first match that hobbled Puskas was intended to do just that. The chances that either of those theories will ever be proven is extraordinarily small, but there will always be a hint of a question in the hearts of those who don’t dream in Schwarzweiss.

    As a long time supporter of the Oranje, it was always easy for me to assume the worst of the Germans, and it was quite enlightening to come to appreciate the German view of Das Wunder von Bern while living in Frankfurt when the film came out. While I still feel that it is unfortunate that the Magic Magyars never won the ultimate title that their talent undoubtedly merited, it seems less of a massive injustice than it did before.

    Part of the reason for the absence of a definitive work in English on the Golden Team is the very significant hurdle posed by the Hungarian language.

  6. “no matter how hard people tried to extrapolate one from the essentially characterless Zidane”

    Can you elaborate on this comment? Are you saying Zidane has no distinctive style of play or that he himself didn’t impart any of his own characteristics to his French teams?

  7. Duffman — That’s the fun of decades-old World Cup scandal, I think: we’ll never be able to say for sure what happened. Along with the suspicions Ursus brought up, there are also allegations that the referee ignored a blatant foul in the box against Kocsis and that Puskas’s disallowed goal wasn’t really offside—although even if true, those could simply point to bad refereeing rather than conspiracy. But we can debate the charges forever and (despite what I wrote when I was taking the Hungarian side) I don’t really have a hard and fast opinion. In the meantime, I’m going to check out Tor, which I haven’t read and am excited about. I was just thinking yesterday that the mania for Cruyff and those Dutch teams (which I gleefully share, by the way) means that the West German team of the 70s doesn’t get enough credit or attention.

    joejoejoe — I meant the latter, more or less. I think Zidane had a hugely distinctive style of play, but that he seemed to be so introverted and self-contained that he never really worked as a Maradona/Cruyff/Beckenbauer-style symbol for the character of his team. It’s not quite that he didn’t impart any of his own characteristics to the team; more that his characteristics were so cryptic that he seemed to make the team more, not less of an enigma.

  8. One more suggestion for your list: Johan Cruyff and FC Barcelona.

    Santiago Segurola writes an excellent summary of why, in Spanish:

    http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marca.com&langpair=es%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8

    Even mangled by Google Translate, it’s still great.

  9. I don’t think it’s ever been possible to associate a personality with the England national team. After all, Frankenstein’s monster didn’t have one. It was just a thing bolted together.

Trackbacks

  1. Daily Dose 12.14.07 - World Football - The Offside - Soccer News and Opinion from leagues around the world