Tradition and Rivalry in. . .MLS?

I was at a bar full of Fire fans last night, watching my Chicago Fire beat DC United 3-2 on aggregate in the first round of the MLS Cup Playoffs. It was a thrilling and agonising game for both sets of fans, the Fire almost blowing a 3-0 aggregate lead, with DC’s late equaliser ruled out (rightly) for a handball. But I don’t bring up the result to taunt DC fans. Instead, I want to highlight how their varied responses to the game say a lot about the progress of MLS.

But that’s jumping ahead. About an hour before the game, when the bar was still filling up, a bloke walked up to his friend, a fairly old Scotsman in a Fire jersey.

“What are you doing here tonight?”, he asked.
“Watching the Fire in the playoffs,” the Scotsman replied.
“Oh, that Mickey Mouse thing?”
“Aye, but you know, that’s what they used to say about the Scottish League.”
“That’s true.”

I think people do still say that about the Scottish League, at least in England, but you wouldn’t do so to a bar full of Rangers or Celtic fans watching an Old Firm derby unless you wanted to lose your teeth.

It may sound trite, but games like last night’s passionate thriller help MLS build its own history and credibility. We are building rivalries, based on passion, bile, loyalty, irrational hatreds. The things leagues that have been around for decades depend on to keep fans interested even if the world’s best players aren’t on the field.

And indeed, try telling the hundred Fire fans screaming their heads off in the bar last night after the game, or the DC fans feeling the pain this morning, that MLS is a Mickey Mouse league. The latter’s responses are especially revealing, as we’ll discover after the jump.


Consider Pitch Invasion contributor Max, a DC supporter. He emailed me last night, after the game, and his words speak for themselves.

I have a splitting headache. And I want to cry. I mean, I literally
want to just cry all over my keyboard. I’ve never reacted to any
play, ever, like that called back goal when I thought it was good.

Good job by your boys. I hate, fucking hate, Blanco so much I can’t
even comprehend.

This is horrible. This is football, huh?

I need beer.

The Score Doesn't Matter
This morning, D at the DCenters emphasises instead his reaction based around pride despite the fall.

Tradition.

It was the slogan of the season, backed up on the web banner by more silver than you see in the teeth of your average Crunk performer, a tally we added to this season. It was a promise, but it was also the biting fear entering this match against Chicago, a team we’ve never beaten in the playoffs, a team that we’ve never scored upon in the playoffs, a team that dealt us one of the most humiliating defeats we’ve ever suffered in 2005.

. . .

Only, tradition is not merely about trophies (though that’s a lot of it) or is it about match results. It is about watching a team I care about, and watching a team repay me with their effort on the pitch. For all the under-10 youth league soccer cliches, sometimes heart can be more rewarding than results, and for me personally this was one of those games. Even as Eric Wynalda was discussing the similarities to 2005 while the sound of the Sabers game on the TV next to us in the bar threatened to drown him out, United rallied and went down fighting. When I thought Gomez had collected our third goal, I screamed aloud, jumping up and down, only to collapse when the goal was (correctly) called back. But they kept at it, even with the disappointment.

Can I complain about the first half? Of course. Can I complain about us losing because of a misstep on the road? Yes, absolutely… But I won’t. Instead, this is more personal. My ultimate complaint is that I was in Buffalo, New York on the final game of DC United’s season, and I didn’t say good-bye in person. For this team honored our tradition, fought valiantly, and I shall miss them. This off-season will likely see at least one of those players I saw not step onto the field again. I didn’t know I wouldn’t see Esky again before he was gone. Who knows how it will be this off-season? And I wish I could have had a chance to say good-bye myself.

In a similar vein, Longshoe at Who Ate all the Cupcakes also emphasises his longstanding connection to DC, and argues it’s something American soccer fans can build best with teams in their own country.

I talked before about the Atlanta Ruckus being the first team I ever really felt connected to. The second was DC United. John Harkes was my favorite player back then, and DCU became my team when Harkes was allocated to them. When they drafted Mike Huwiler, a former Ruckus player, that just sealed the deal. I still have the first DC United shirt they ever sold, with Harkes’ autograph on it, even though it’s pretty much falling apart at this point.

By this point in my soccer life, I was able to see the big European teams play from time to time. I saw a Manchester United v. Newcastle game that hooked me on the Red Devils because of their attacking style and Cantona’s brilliance. However, I’d get to see that United 4 or 5 times a season while I could see the DC version in most every game. It was no contest as to who I cared about more.

. . .

I don’t have that type of history with other teams I follow, there’s too much distance. I’ll go out of my way to see a DC game, but just don’t care about other teams enough to do the same. DCU feels like “my team” while I just like watching the others play. Does that make any sense? It’s hard to really put into words, but that’s how it is.

That’s why I get so ticked when people say things like, “But it’s only MLS…” or “That was a pretty good for an MLS game…” or something similar. This league, the one in our backyards, shouldn’t be taking a backseat to leagues thousands of miles and oceans away. I really want to see that change quicker.

Next week (if the New England Revolution put away the New York Red Bulls this weekend) the Fire will travel to Foxboro for another playoff match up with the Revolution, something we face with a similar trepidation as DC do when they face us in the playoffs. There’s history there; bitterness there; scores to be settled on the field, and everyone involved will feel it.

This is what the league needs to build itself on: stories of revenge, redemption, long standing emnities, rather than the empty marketing we saw in the songs the league commissioned for each team.

Photo by Max J. Rosenthal on Flickr.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tagged as: , , ,

About the Author
Thomas Dunmore
Email this author | All posts by Thomas Dunmore

You might also like:

Con Te Partiro, Revolution
You will have to excuse me for a little self-indulgence today (though I will offer a slightly broader justification...
The Ring of Fire
Last night, the Chicago Fire made their latest induction into the club's Ring of Fire, which acknowledges heroes...
A Weekend in the Big Apple
It's a holiday weekend here in the United States, and Pitch Invasion won't be updated until Tuesday as your editor...
Reporting on MLS: Will teams hire their own beat coverage?
The collapse of the newspaper industry comes at a terrible time for a growing league like MLS. Numerous MLS...
Grab this Widget

8 Comments

  1. Since you’re being magnanimous (isn’t it great when you’re able to be this way?) at the moment, I’m more than happy to taunt the DC United fans for you.

    Ha, ha!

    I do have to say, this thing of tradition and rivalry in MLS may be building in some places, but its a mistake to think that it’s newfound in any way. The most gripping and heartbreaking MLS experience I’ve ever had – at least outside of being in the stadium in person – was at the late, lamented ESC bar Nathan Hale’s for the deciding game of the Metro-Chicago series. When Valencia knocked the ball, only to have the goal waved off…shades of Gomez’s (intentionally handled) non-goal last night. I’d never seen so many grown people in tears at one time, as I did that night when the final whistle blew. And that was in 2000. So it’s been coming along for some time.

    Good on your Scottish friend for having the right perspective.

  2. Interesting to hear, Metrologist. But that raises the rather sorry counter-example of that tradition having been destroyed by the rebranding that you know all too well about personally.

    My point isn’t that this is all brand new by the way, only that it’s building and progressing. These things build over a generation. The rivalry the Fire have with New England, for example, has already replaced an older rivalry with Dallas for most our fans, based on the past few years.

    But there’s still that rivalry with Dallas to some degree, too. And next year, if we play DC again in the playoffs, it’ll be that bit more intense again. The more markers to the past there are, the more involved people feel year-on-year and the more authenticity the whole league has.

    It’s not even necessarily about having been there yourself the whole time — a sixteen year old Cubs fan, for example, might only have been suffering for ten years, but they feel the weight of that century of failure on their shoulders too. Maybe not as intensely as a sixty-year old fan, but it’s there. Unless they’re passed out drunk in the bleachers, of course.

  3. I completely agree that a big way that the league gains relevance is by building – and celebrating – its history. In 1996, the other teams were just new, different, and detestable only based on whether a player you didn’t like ended up on their roster. Now, ask a Crew fan what they think about DC, or Chicago, and you’ll get stories of past incidents to fuel dislike (sadly, I’m not sure either team views us with anything other than pity – at least these days).

    On the other hand, though, the league still is young enough that these rivalries haven’t completely solidified yet – as evidenced by the fact that the Brimstone Cup isn’t what it was, while the Chicago-New England axis gets more intense. In Columbus, there’s been a see-saw between Chicago and DC for our “most hated” opponent. I might have the wrong impression of other sports or leagues, but I have a hard time thinking of other rivalries as subject to change.

    I also wonder whether the league is still too small to really notice its rivalries. I remember growing up in Browns territory as a kid, and what I remember, looking back, is both how much teams like Pittsburgh or Cincinnati were hated – and teams like Detroit or Indianapolis were irrelevant. Even an in-conference team like Houston was ho-hum. But with that many NFL teams, you can have a range of intensities much more easily than a league of 10 (or even 14) teams.

  4. I agree with Thomas – you don’t want to be in a pub watching Celtic v Rangers – you will loose your teeth if rooting for the wrong side.

    MLS is still in its infancy and rivalries, team tradition and loyalties still need to be cultivated and developed.

    The passion, disappointment and opinion expressed by users comments here is testament to the birth of a strong and loyal fan base. Getting really upset with a player from your own or opposing team is natural in my view. We live our lives in other players to a certain extent – so our gut reactions of joy and disappointment are basic instincts kicking it.

  5. The mls has a classico and they are L.A GALAXY versus D.C UNITED the oldest classic rivals in the USA. These two have fought each other since 1996 and are the only two teams to win the concacaf champions league, and its always fun to see them go at it.

Trackbacks

  1. Daily Dose 11.03.07 - World Football - The Offside - Soccer News and Opinion from leagues around the world